{"id":1033,"date":"2021-07-12T15:13:26","date_gmt":"2021-07-12T15:13:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.effectacompliance.com\/?p=1033"},"modified":"2021-07-12T15:13:26","modified_gmt":"2021-07-12T15:13:26","slug":"a-change-in-control-is-more-than-just-a-standard-notification","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.effectacompliance.com\/a-change-in-control-is-more-than-just-a-standard-notification\/","title":{"rendered":"A Change in Control Is More than Just a Standard Notification"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Financial Conduct Authority (\u201cFCA\u201d) recently released a Final Notice opposing the Change in Control (\u201cCiC\u201d) and therefore acquisition of Kimberly Forex UK Limited (\u201cKimberly Forex\u201d) and the details within the FCA Final Notice were a good reminder that the CiC process is more than just a standard notification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The CiC process requires the FCA to review and approve the CiC in advance of it happening by receiving a Section 178 Notice (\u201cs178\u201d) from the firms and \/ or individuals involved. Most importantly, failure to request FCA approval prior to executing the CiC is a criminal offence, <\/strong>regardless of any mitigating circumstances that led to the procedure not being correctly followed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

FCA Final Notice Ms Sherrie Jean Thackray of Kimberly Forex (now Transfer Gurus Limited)<\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n

The FCA published their Final Notice for the Kimberly Forex decision on the 11th<\/sup> May 2021 and it can be found here: Final Notice 2021: Ms Sherrie Jean Thackray (fca.org.uk)<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To summarise, Ms Sherrie Jean Thackray acquired 100% ownership of Transfer Gurus Limited on September 1, 2019. This information was confirmed via Companies House records.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the FCA notes that Ms Thackray submitted the s178 Notice on the 25th<\/sup> August 2020, almost a year after the acquisition. In her email dated 11 September 2020 Ms Thackray clarified that she \u201cbecame 100% shareholder before receiving FCA approval\u201d, therefore admitting to the breach. Also, the information provided within the s178 was incomplete with only the first three pages completed and the rest left blank, meaning the FCA could not make a determination on the application.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 16 September 2020, the FCA explained the post notification implications to Ms Thackray, including that it is a criminal offence to acquire control without the FCA\u2019s approval. Ms Thackray did not respond to this email or to the subsequent two emails sent on 29th<\/sup> September and 13th<\/sup> October 2020. The Final Notice stated that as of the date of publication no response had been forthcoming.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is clear from reviewing the Final Notice that Ms Thackray undertook a CiC without making any consideration of the process, or attempting to work with the FCA on reaching a conclusion. Had the s178 been submitted in advance of the CiC occurring and had Ms Thackray worked with the FCA to meet their requirements, it is likely this outcome could have been avoided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Effecta has noted that some firms within the industry are only raising the requirement to make a s178 notification to the FCA post event and are therefore committing a criminal offence without realising the magnitude of this oversight. It is Effecta\u2019s opinion that this issue can be avoided with pre-planning and an increased awareness of the rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is a Change in Control<\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Part XII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (\u201cFSMA\u201d), requires controllers to seek approval via a s178 Notice from the FCA before gaining or increasing control over a firm or becoming a parent undertaking of a firm, that is authorised by the FCA and\/or PRA.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thresholds for control are divided into the following threshold:<\/p>\n\n\n\n